| SUBJECT: DEQ File No.97-59-0023; T11N; R10W, Sec. 20;
Montcalm County
Dear Mr. DeVries:
It has come to the attention of
the Department of Environmental Quality that there has been recent
unauthorized activity on the above referenced parcel of property.
You have been certified as the legal landowner and/or contractor
who did the following unauthorized activity:
Construction and maintenance of two wood debris dams
across the outlet stream of Spring Pond.
A permit must be issued prior to the start of this
type of activity. A review of the department's files shows that no
permits have been issued. Therefore, the Department has determined
that this activity is in violation of Part 301, Inland Lakes and
Streams, of the Natural Resource and Environmental Protection Act,
Act 451 of the Public Acts of 1994, being sections 324.30101 to 324.30113
of the Michigan Compiled Laws, annotated. The Department has been
informed that one or both of the dams partially failed during a recent
rain event, causing debris and flooding at downstream locations.
We find that dams of this nature are inherently hazardous and cannot
be permitted. The Department therefore orders you to cease and desist
all activities at this location, and to restore the stream to a free-flow
condition by removing all wood and brush forming the dams from the
stream channel. All restoration work shall be completed no later
than January 31,
2005.
Please notify this office when the restoration has
been completed so that a follow-up site inspection may be scheduled
by our staff. Failure to comply with this request or any further
unauthorized activity on the site may result in this case being referred
for elevated enforcement action. We anticipate and would appreciate
your full cooperation in this matter.
Please feel free to contact
me at this office if you have any questions.
Sincerely, David L.
Price,
District Representative Land and Water Management Division
Re: DEQ File No.97-59-0023; T11N; R10W, Sec. 20;
Montcalm County.
Dear Mr. Price,
Your certified letter dated 12/17/02 has been handed
to me to respond to. I am the legal landowner but not the Contractor
at 2088 Dagget, Pierson, Michigan. A couple of beavers are in the
process of constructing and maintaining two wood "debris" dams
across the outlet stream of my Spring Pond.
While I did not pay for, authorize, nor supervise their
dam project, I think they would be highly offended that you call
their skillful use of natures building materials "debris." I
would like to challenge your department to attempt to emulate their
dam project any time and/or any place you choose.
I believe I can
safely state there is no way you could ever match their dam skills,
their dam resourcefulness, their dam ingenuity, their dam persistence,
their dam determination and/or their dam work ethic. As to your request,
I do not think the beavers are aware that they must first fill out
a dam permit prior to the start of this type of dam activity.
My first dam question to you is:
Are you trying
to discriminate against my Spring Pond Beavers, or do you require
all beavers throughout this state to conform to said dam request?
If you are not discriminating against these particular
beavers, through the Freedom of Information Act, I request completed
copies of all those other applicable beaver dam permits that have
been issued. Perhaps we will see if there really is a dam violation
of Part 301, Inland Lakes and Streams, of the Natural Resource and
Environmental Protection Act, Act 451 of the Public Acts of 1994,
being sections 324.30101 to 324.30113 of the Michigan Compiled Laws,
annotated.
I have several concerns. My first concern is; aren't
the beavers entitled to legal representation? The Spring Pond Beavers
are financially destitute and are unable to pay for said representation
-- so the State will have to provide them with a dam lawyer. The
Department's dam concern that either one or both of the dams failed
during a recent rain event, causing flooding, is proof that this
is a natural occurrence, which the Department is required to protect.
In other words, we should leave the Spring Pond Beavers alone rather
than harassing them and calling their dam names.
If you want the stream "restored" to a dam
free-flow condition please contact the beavers -- but if you are
going to arrest them, they obviously did not pay any attention to
your dam letter, they being unable to read English.
In my humble opinion, the Spring Pond Beavers have
a right to build their unauthorized dams as long as the sky is blue,
the grass is green and water flows downstream. They have more dam
rights than I do to live and enjoy Spring Pond. If the Department
of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection lives up to its
name, it should protect the natural resources(Beavers) and the environment
(Beavers' Dams).
So, as far as the beavers and I are concerned, this
dam case can be referred for more elevated enforcement action right
now. Why wait until 1/31/2005? The Spring Pond Beavers may be under
the dam ice then and there will be no way for you or your dam staff
to contact/harass them then.
In conclusion, I would like to bring to your attention
to a real environmental quality (health) problem in the area. It
is the bears! Bears are actually defecating in our woods. I definitely
believe you should be persecuting the defecating bears and leave
the beavers alone. If you are going to investigate the beaver dam,
watch your step! (The bears are not careful where they dump!)
Being unable to comply with your dam request, and being
unable to contact you on your dam answering machine, I am sending
this response to your dam office.
THANK YOU.
RYAN DEVRIES & THE DAM BEAVERS |